Showing posts with label Pope Benedict XVI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pope Benedict XVI. Show all posts

Monday, October 29, 2007

Opus Dei: Beyond Dan Brown's fiction



Opus Dei is Latin for "the work of God" but the name has gained a darker association for readers of Dan Brown's book The Da Vinci Code, which has sold more than 40 million copies worldwide. Brown's novel paints the real-life religious organization as a sinister Catholic cult, embodied by the book's villain, Silas. Brown depicted Opus Dei as a secretive, powerful and murderous sect, whose members whip themselves bloody. Members of Opus Dei say their portrayal in the book is a mistaken and exaggerated caricature. But Brown's image will reach an even larger audience when the big-budget movie based on the book and starring Tom Hanks opens in theatres on May 19.

Long before Brown wrote about Opus Dei, a shroud of mystery surrounded the organization. Numerous writers and journalists have tried to pin the group down. And despite the media blitz Opus Dei has launched in anticipation of the film's release, there isn't one clear picture.

What is Opus Dei?

Opus Dei is a worldwide organization of people and priests, within the structure of the Roman Catholic Church.

"The mission of Opus Dei is to help people, normal people, to integrate their faith in their day-to-day life," says Monique David, the director of the Opus Dei Council of Women in Canada, and a member of Opus Dei's press office.

David says members of Opus Dei hold prayer and study meetings, retreats, classes and workshops. These are held at either an Opus Dei centre - there are 19 in Canada - or at a church or private homes. Members also do charity work in the name of Opus Dei and in connection with other organizations.

It was started in 1928 by Josemaria Escriva, a Spanish priest who became a saint in 2002. Opus Dei had an all-male membership until 1930.

In 1982, the organization became a personal prelature, which means that it is part of the church's structure. Like a diocese, it is overseen by a bishop and has its own clergy and lay representatives, but instead of being defined geographically, it is defined by its purpose worldwide. To date, Opus Dei is the only personal prelature under the Vatican. David says Opus Dei members still belong to their local parishes, but participate in the prelature's activities. The governing bishop - or prelate - is elected by members, and approved by the Pope. The current prelate is Bishop Javier Echevarria. Opus Dei is seen as a conservative organization - remaining true to the teachings of the Catholic Church.

Who are the members of Opus Dei?

There were 87,116 members worldwide in 2005, 1,902 of whom are priests. Members are in 61 countries, including Canada and the United States. About 55 per cent of members worldwide are women. In Canada, about 60 per cent are female.

Catholics who have been involved in Opus Dei activities may become members if they make a lifelong commitment and are at least 18 years old, although it takes five years after the initial devotion to become a full member. Anyone, even if not Roman Catholic, can take part in Opus Dei activities.

There are three types of members:
"Numeraries" commit to celibacy but do not become priests. They make up less than 30 per cent of the organization and often live in Opus Dei centres.

"Supernumeraries" are generally married Opus Dei members, and make up about 70 per cent of the organization. Their "path to holiness" is generally achieved through the sanctification of their family duties.

"Numerary assistants" are generally women who perform domestic duties full-time in Opus Dei centres.

Other volunteers, known as "cooperators" or friends of Opus Dei, help with prayers or give their work or their time. They don't necessarily need to be Catholic or even Christian.

How much of what is portrayed about Opus Dei in The Da Vinci Code is accurate?

Dan Brown, on his website, says his book is a work of fiction, but he adds, "[it is] based on numerous books written about Opus Dei as well as on my own personal interviews with current and former members."

Brown characterizes the group as a reclusive organization - with monks who kill at will - and wield special influence in the Roman Catholic Church.

David disputes this, and says they're just a small organization of religious people. "There is no monk in Opus Dei. There is no murder," she laughs.

David says Brown got only one thing right: "The way [Brown] has spelled Opus Dei. That's the only thing that is OK. All the rest is pure caricature, mistaken and misleading."

John Allen, a journalist for the National Catholic Reporter and CNN's Vatican correspondent, says the truth is somewhere in between. Allen was the first journalist who was given insider access to Opus Dei. He wrote the book Opus Dei: an objective look behind the myths and the reality of the most controversial force in the Catholic Church.

"I think the bottom line is there's a lot less there than people might think," said Allen, during a November 2005 interview with CBC Radio's The Current. "They are simply not as rich, not as influential, not as successful in gaining new recruits, and so on, as people imagine."

But Dianne DiNicola, an American whose daughter is a former numerary, says Opus Dei has "questionable practices." She says her daughter Tammy became reclusive and her personality changed after she joined the group. DiNicola says her daughter was strictly controlled, turned over her paycheque to Opus Dei and needed permission to leave for outings.

"They condition a person so that they get their mind, and they don't realize that they don't have freedom," she says. "And in my daughter's case, she left after a family intervention."

DiNicola started the Opus Dei Awareness Network in 1991 to tell people what they experienced. She says their website posts testimonies from about 25 other former members.

Still, DiNicola says Brown's depiction is inaccurate and "is a sensationalist view of Opus Dei."

Do Opus Dei members practise corporal mortification - the practice of wearing a spiked chain around the leg or striking themselves with a small whip once a week?

Yes, but it's voluntary and not violent, says David. She says it's only practised by about 30 per cent of members, only the numeraries.

The cilice - a spiked chain worn around the leg - is used for two hours a day. David says it leaves "a little pinch in the skin." But, she emphasizes, there is no blood.

"In the Da Vinci Code, it is a grotesque caricature of the reality."

The discipline they perform on themselves is done with a rope with knotted strands and is used once a week. David says this is used on the back, lightly, and for a short period of time while reciting a prayer.

"If you know the Hail Mary, I think it's 40 words. That's it. … It's more symbolic than anything else."

Both the cilice and the discipline are used as a reminder of Jesus' suffering on the cross, she says.
"It's not for everybody," says David. "But it's not Opus Dei who invented it either." Many saints of the church used it as well, including Mother Teresa, she says.

Allen agrees. "It would certainly be something that most Catholics would have a hard time understanding or accepting," he said. "But it is a practice that comes with the full approval and warrant of church authority."

However, Escriva once left blood on the walls after using the discipline. The event was described in Allen's book and in an Escriva biography by Italian journalist Andrea Tornielli.

It happened in Madrid during the Spanish civil war. Escriva and his followers were stuck in the Honduran consulate. Escriva's chief aide - and eventual successor as prelate of Opus Dei - Alvaro del Portillo, was sick and couldn't leave the room. Escriva asked Portillo to cover his head with a blanket while he used the discipline. Portillo said he heard "more than a thousand terrible blows" and "the floor was covered with blood, but he cleaned it up before the others came in." But, David notes, Escriva explicitly told members not to imitate this.

How wealthy and influential is Opus Dei?

This, too, is hard to pinpoint. Their assets are estimated at $2.8 billion, with an annual budget of $1.7 million, according to Allen. These figures are based on financial statements for programs in Rome, Spain, the United States, the United Kingdom, Kenya, Peru and Argentina. However, this isn't a complete financial profile. Because many of their "corporate works" like schools, and universities do not "belong" to Opus Dei, but rather are owned by the laypeople, who also operate them. This includes the $69 million, 17-storey headquarters in New York City.

David, however, adds that the building's purchase was covered largely by a donation from an Opus Dei cooperator. She adds there is no specific amount of money members are required to give to the organization. But, she says, numeraries usually give the remainder of their paycheques after living expenses are taken, amounting to about 20 per cent of their income.

Some critics say that Opus Dei wields considerable power in politics, but specifically within the Catholic Church. Many arguments centre on Escriva's "fast-track" to sainthood. Pope John Paul II canonized Escriva in 2002, 27 years after his death.

David agrees that's faster than normal, but says no steps were skipped. And, she adds, the canonization process was sped up for all candidates, not just for Escriva.

Other criticisms include that as the only personal prelature, Opus Dei has a special place within the church. David, however, refutes that. "It's not a special status for Opus Dei," she says. "It is a juridical form that exists in the Catholic Church. And the goal of that is to perform some specific mission that is entrusted to them by the Vatican."

The group has a reputation for being secretive, but Opus Dei has recently gone on a public relations blitz, in anticipation of The Da Vinci Code film release. David says Brown's novel - and the movie - may help the organization in the end.

"Before, we were not interesting for the media," she says. "And now, the media is interested in knowing what the real Opus Dei is, so we're taking advantage of it."

INDEPTH: CATHOLICISM IN CANADA CBC News Online May 12, 2006
(http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/catholicism/opusdei.html)

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

The empire strikes back

Title:The empire strikes backAuthors:Jill Rowbotham (Jill Rowbotham is The Australian's religious affairs writer.)Source:Australian, The; 25/05/2007

The empire strikes back
Edition: 1 - All-round Country
Section: Features, pg। 013




Attempting to hold back the tide of atheist literature and popular fiction, the Pope has launched a tome about Jesus, and it's set to be a bestseller, writes Jill Rowbotham.

WHEN The Da Vinci Code opened in cinemas across the world a year ago and became a box office hit, Pope Benedict XVI, then a year into his reign, remained silent on the theme that Jesus and Mary Magdalene had produced a line of descendants whom the Catholic Church and its subsidiary, Opus Dei, had long conspired to conceal.

The Pope was in fact working on a blockbuster of his own and last week his version of Jesus' story, Jesus of Nazareth, went on sale in the world's largest English language market, North America.

German, Polish and Italian versions of his book have already rung up sales of one million since their release last month.

When his new work hit the bookshops, the 80-year-old leader of the world's one billion Catholics, formerly Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, was on a tour of Latin America.

Last week Newsweek published an excerpt from the new book about Jesus' baptism by John the Baptist, saying: ``Benedict's portrait may contribute little to our historical understanding of Jesus, but what he does give is a window into his own, passionate and uncompromising faith, a faith that faces constant challenge in the world of ideas.''

Newsweek points out that Benedict, an elderly German theologian once labelled God's rottweiler, has been notoriously disapproving of unauthorised views of Jesus, even suspending an American priest for writing a book about Jesus that did not give sufficient credence to the resurrection.

``But for orthodox Christian believers, Benedict's book is a gift, a series of homilies on the New Testament by a masterful scriptural exegete,'' Newsweek says.

In Australia, religious scholar Francis Moloney has greeted the Pope's book enthusiastically. ``What's exciting to a person in my trade is here we have not just a historical report of what may or may not have happened, he's interested in what it means and what it means for him is that the baptism points to the cross, which links
it to Christian baptism.''

Moloney, who heads the Salesian order of John Bosco in Australia and the Pacific, is also an author. His latest book, The Gospel According to Judas, co-written with Jeffrey Archer, was released before Easter to widespread publicity.

He is interested to see what the Pope's books -- this is the first of two volumes -- will make of some of Christianity's abiding knotty problems: that Jesus was fully God and fully man, and part of a trinity with God the father and the holy spirit. ``It will be much more nuanced than most mainstream believers who would have it that Jesus of Nazareth walked around Palestine saying he was the second person of the divine trinity.''

Paul Collins, a former priest and now a commentator on the Catholic Church, declares the Newsweek excerpt ``vintage Ratzinger'', a reference to the Pope's long academic career in Germany before he was seconded to the Vatican.

``It's a theological interpretation of Jesus' life, not a conventional look at the Gospels in the sense that it is a verse by verse commentary,'' Collins says. ``In many ways he looks for the deeper symbolic meaning in the text and that in some ways is new, not in the church's traditions but in terms of modern scholarship of Jesus.''

In the baptism scene, Collins says Ratzinger struggles with the theology of Jesus being both divine and human. Although contemporary theological study emphasises Jesus as sharing in the human condition, the papal view is emphatic about Jesus' access to God and his reflection of the will of God.

Moloney and Collins zero in on the Pope's reassertion of the divinity of Jesus and reject that it was written in response to Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code, saying it has been in production for decades -- Moloney claims up to 30 years, Collins estimates up to 20 -- and with a number of chapters completed before Ratzinger became
Pope.

They have differing theories about a passage picked up by the media in the earlier translations released last month, which refers to ``the worst books, which destroy the figure of Jesus and dismantle faith'' and the interpretation of the Bible going down ``mistaken paths''.

Moloney speculates that the books the Pope refers to would not be popular fiction such as Brown's. ``The holy father would be concerned about much more dangerous books, serious scholarly books, particularly those coming out of the Jesus Seminar, that reduce Jesus to a mere 1st century wandering charismatic prophet.''

The Jesus Seminar is a group of modern scholars concerned with establishing what is historically reliable about the Gospels and Jesus. Its The Five Gospels: What Did Jesus Really Say? by founder Robert W. Funk was published in 1997. Benedict XVI believes it gets the balance between Jesus' humanity and divinity wrong. There also has been a slew of anti-religion writers gaining a lot of media attention, among them Richard Dawkins, author of The God Delusion (also showing as a two-part series on ABC television); Christopher Hitchens, author of God is Not Great; American writer Sam Harris, with Letter to a Christian Nation; and, most recently, France's Michel Onfray, with The Atheist Manifesto.

Collins detects papal concern about another modern theological movement. ``He's obviously still quite critical of the way in which certain interpretations of scripture would work, for example liberation theology,'' he says. Liberation theology argues it is the church's responsibility to support human rights activism and to agitateor social change.

One of the movement's champions, San Salvador's archbishop Oscar Romero, was shot dead in 1980 after a sermon urging soldiers to stop carrying out the government's repressive orders. The movement has been a strong influence in Latin America in recent decades, angering the Vatican.

John Paul II aggressively opposed it -- Collins says he regarded it as a ``deviant exegesis [interpretation] of scripture'' -- and so did then cardinal Ratzinger. Moloney says: ``Cardinal Ratzinger was very opposed to it in the early days because he felt it was linked to a Marxist theology.''

There was clear evidence of that during the Pope's five-day visit to Brazil. The world's ``most Catholic'' country with 125 million followers was targeted to try to stop the significant outflow of faithful to Pentecostalism. The Pope is not the only church leader with this problem: the denominations that come under this category are experiencing satisfying rates of growth across several countries, including Australia, where they are represented by congregations such as Sydney's Hillsong and the Christian City Churches. Pentecostals tend to have a demonstrative style of worship, with an emphasis on music, and a conservative attitude to the Bible.

While in Brazil, the Pope attacked ``ethical relativism'', reiterated the church's opposition to contraception, abortion and divorce, and slammed rampant capitalism.

The Brazil visit is the biggest stir BenedictXVI has made since his famous speech in September at the University of Regensburg in Germany. He caused an uproar by quoting from a dialogue between Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus and ``an educated Persian'' that probably took place at the turn of the 14th century: ``Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.''

Eruptions of Muslim protest greeted these remarks and there was forensic examination of their meaning and context, but it was clear that intentionally or not, the pontiff profoundly offended some sections of that community. Collins attributes the impolitic remark to a changing of the guard in the Vatican: the trip fell between the departure of Cardinal Angelo Sodano as secretary of state and the arrival of his replacement, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone. He points out it was taken out of context, the response to it was an overreaction and that the Pope made up for it with his trip to Turkey in December, when pictures of him in Istanbul's Blue Mosque were published across the world.

Like any world statesman the Pope juggles a range of issues: reconciliation with Anglican and Orthodox Christians, relations with Islam and relations with China, sexual abuse by clergy, pressure for concessions on condoms and celibacy, and dealing with AIDS.

While he has been trying to shore up relations and numbers in South America, bemusement has been building about when he will announce that Catholics are allowed once more to say the ancient Tridentine Mass in Latin, as opposed to saying the modern mass in Latin. The Second Vatican Council did away with the right to the former as part of the 1960s reforms that modernised the church. Collins says the old Latin mass's return has been ``predicted more often than Dame Nellie Melba's retirement'', noting it is an indication the Pope sometimes has difficulty making up his mind.

The feeling in Rome, says Collins, is that the Pope is getting more people to his public audiences than John Paul II, and that the composition of the crowd is fewer tourists and more followers.

``I certainly think the Pope has softened and he thinks it is his responsibility to be more universal, a reconciler of the community, but nonetheless he has not in any way compromised on a lot of the themes that were typical of him before his elevation.''

Australians will be able to make their own assessment in July next year, when the pontiff is due to make his first visit here to conduct the closing mass for World Youth Day in Sydney.
Copyright 2007 / The Australian
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Australian, The, MAY 25, 2007 Item: 200705251013009640